Forum Crackdown

[Divey]

I assume "Sufficient right to post" has some nuance in regards to whether the post is clear troll or someone genuinely trying to support a case without being involved?

This really goes for specific subsections, the wording of the rule is very vague but as long as you read the rules of the sub forum you wish to post in, you'll be fine. Again, none of the warning rules are new. if someone is however trying to support a case without any evidence and without being involved and is simply agreeing with a person out of their own opinion, they will be warned.

[Divey]

What does arguing mean?

Updated the list, was using my own abbreviations but now made is clearer!

[RIC0H]

The rules haven't just been added to, we have removed unnecessary rules, contradictions

Maybe you can remove/tweak this contradiction: https://www.fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=63609

Example points that are not abuse:
Applying god mode to themself, even in a raid this may be needed for admin duties.

Example points that are abuse:
Using godmode/heal during a raid solely to give himself a fighting advantages

[Joe Joe]

The rules haven't just been added to, we have removed unnecessary rules, contradictions

Maybe you can remove/tweak this contradiction: https://www.fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=63609

Example points that are not abuse:
Applying god mode to themself, even in a raid this may be needed for admin duties.

Example points that are abuse:
Using godmode/heal during a raid solely to give himself a fighting advantages

I dont see how that is a contradiction. If Godmode is used to assist in the raid then it classes as abuse however if the Admin must use godmode to deal with a staff sit there is no issue and is not abuse

[Wolven]

The rules haven't just been added to, we have removed unnecessary rules, contradictions

Maybe you can remove/tweak this contradiction: https://www.fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=63609

Example points that are not abuse:
Applying god mode to themself, even in a raid this may be needed for admin duties.

Example points that are abuse:
Using godmode/heal during a raid solely to give himself a fighting advantages

that ain't contradiction lol

[RIC0H]

I dont see how that is a contradiction. If Godmode is used to assist in the raid then it classes as abuse however if the Admin must use godmode to deal with a staff sit there is no issue and is not abuse

If they're in a sit, then they'll be in noclip, come to think of it, since admins use noclip for admin duties I see no reason for them to actually have access to godmode.

[Ranger]

I dont see how that is a contradiction. If Godmode is used to assist in the raid then it classes as abuse however if the Admin must use godmode to deal with a staff sit there is no issue and is not abuse

If they're in a sit, then they'll be in noclip, come to think of it, since admins use noclip for admin duties I see no reason for them to actually have access to godmode.

You know people can still shoot and kill us in no-clip yeah? We do frequently need goodmode to handle certain situations.

[S!RNARC]

it didnt work

[SoulRipper]

it didnt work

Your wish is my command.

[Mist]

Is that how it works? Well, in that case...!