+- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net)
+-- Forum: Community & Server Information (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: News & Announcements (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+---- Forum: Archive (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=36)
+---- Thread: Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts (/showthread.php?tid=73657)
RE: Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts - Mist - 08-01-2016
Aww.. Sound boring. I believe that if a person has vital infomation, he should be allowed to put it in the courthouse, as these are all (at time) very serious cases of admin abuse, and whatnot.
But who gives a flying F about my opinion anyway?
RE: Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts - Jonas - 08-01-2016
Really nice to see!
I hope this will make the Courthouse look way more proffesional than before, instead of just a few posts that is so uneeded for.
Jonas
Fearless Teacher
RE: Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts - User 19014 - 08-01-2016
Yay, thats me banned
RE: Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts - Panda - 08-01-2016
Good decision, should help out.
RE: Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts - User 19014 - 08-01-2016
no its not
RE: Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts - Agorith - 08-01-2016
(08-01-2016, 01:21 PM)MidgetHD Wrote:(08-01-2016, 12:51 PM)Agorith Wrote:(08-01-2016, 12:39 PM)MidgetHD Wrote: Yh well, wasn't needed tbh but guess this is all FL can do now apparently..
How would you argue it was not needed?
To be fair, some constructive critisism could go a long way.
However witty/sassy comments like yours prove you choose to be ignorant.
Ignorant to the fact you know we do a hell of a lot more than some of you like to portray us.
The ''change to punishments for uninvolved posts'' internal discussion barely took any effort, because why would it have?
Whenever we do anything, we'll get sourpusses complaining about it because it's not the ''update'' they personally wanted.
Where's all the positivity at, I am certain this change will be for the better as it's a simple rule we can now enforce with harsher punishments when violated, which on its turn will leave the courthouse section looking cleaner than ever, making it easier on the eyes for everyone.
Rather not start a flame war with you. Cheers
Nobody's telling you to start a flame war, just be a decent person with a decent IQ and you'll be able to have plenty of valuable discussions with people.
RE: Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts - Adamantite - 08-01-2016
(08-01-2016, 03:06 PM)Agorith Wrote:(08-01-2016, 01:21 PM)MidgetHD Wrote:(08-01-2016, 12:51 PM)Agorith Wrote:(08-01-2016, 12:39 PM)MidgetHD Wrote: Yh well, wasn't needed tbh but guess this is all FL can do now apparently..
How would you argue it was not needed?
To be fair, some constructive critisism could go a long way.
However witty/sassy comments like yours prove you choose to be ignorant.
Ignorant to the fact you know we do a hell of a lot more than some of you like to portray us.
The ''change to punishments for uninvolved posts'' internal discussion barely took any effort, because why would it have?
Whenever we do anything, we'll get sourpusses complaining about it because it's not the ''update'' they personally wanted.
Where's all the positivity at, I am certain this change will be for the better as it's a simple rule we can now enforce with harsher punishments when violated, which on its turn will leave the courthouse section looking cleaner than ever, making it easier on the eyes for everyone.
Rather not start a flame war with you. Cheers
Nobody's telling you to start a flame war, just be a decent person with a decent IQ and you'll be able to have plenty of valuable discussions with people.
So you basically just called him a retard.
RE: Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts - Kahjo - 08-01-2016
Aaaand. The first punishment goes to Frost, who posted into Ping-Hotels unblacklist request. *Aplodes*
RE: Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts - Luna - 08-01-2016
Good stuff. Stops the uninvolved people away.
RE: Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts - Agorith - 08-01-2016
(08-01-2016, 03:15 PM)Adam James Wrote:(08-01-2016, 03:06 PM)Agorith Wrote:(08-01-2016, 01:21 PM)MidgetHD Wrote:(08-01-2016, 12:51 PM)Agorith Wrote:(08-01-2016, 12:39 PM)MidgetHD Wrote: Yh well, wasn't needed tbh but guess this is all FL can do now apparently..
How would you argue it was not needed?
To be fair, some constructive critisism could go a long way.
However witty/sassy comments like yours prove you choose to be ignorant.
Ignorant to the fact you know we do a hell of a lot more than some of you like to portray us.
The ''change to punishments for uninvolved posts'' internal discussion barely took any effort, because why would it have?
Whenever we do anything, we'll get sourpusses complaining about it because it's not the ''update'' they personally wanted.
Where's all the positivity at, I am certain this change will be for the better as it's a simple rule we can now enforce with harsher punishments when violated, which on its turn will leave the courthouse section looking cleaner than ever, making it easier on the eyes for everyone.
Rather not start a flame war with you. Cheers
Nobody's telling you to start a flame war, just be a decent person with a decent IQ and you'll be able to have plenty of valuable discussions with people.
So you basically just called him a retard.
Those are your words aren't they?
I never called him anything of the sorts, rather just made clear that with those 2 things you've got enough to have valuable discussions.
I'm sure his IQ is fine.