Character
Rules
Events
Map
RP Points
Proplimits
Statistics
Steam Group
Members
Hall of Fame
Team
Bans
Blacklists
Warnings
Changelog
Content
02-27-2021, 05:14 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:08 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
And again all your replies prove my point you simply don't care about anything else other than the fact that you got the piece of evidence you wanted but you aren't willing to talk about the whole story
it's like helping someone rob a bank just to provide evidence that he robbed a bank.
You are all at fault for having the convo in the first place and the fact that you edited the narrative to make it 1 sided is where you are extra wrong and in my opinion, he shouldn't be banned if you arent too for having the convo in the first place then again you edited it in a way to make him look guilty and you are innocent when in reality you are all guilty for having the convo and you are EXTRA guilty for literally tampering with the evidence to try to get someone you have been complaining about to look like they are to blame and that is why its unfair in my opinion
it's like helping someone rob a bank just to provide evidence that he robbed a bank.
You are all at fault for having the convo in the first place and the fact that you edited the narrative to make it 1 sided is where you are extra wrong and in my opinion, he shouldn't be banned if you arent too for having the convo in the first place then again you edited it in a way to make him look guilty and you are innocent when in reality you are all guilty for having the convo and you are EXTRA guilty for literally tampering with the evidence to try to get someone you have been complaining about to look like they are to blame and that is why its unfair in my opinion