Devas

[Zharkan16]

User has been warned for this post. Reason: Posting in a thread when not involved

I'm not even arguing with you or choosing sides
Here's a summary of what I have to say/been saying

1) Is Devas wrong for saying ALL that? Yes
2) Did devas randomly say all that? No
3) Were 2 people that hate him for raiding them there? Yes
4) Was the video suspicious due to being cut short when you could've literally collected more evidence and as proof he continued to speak before it was cut? Yes
5) Is explaining how saying xyz racist being racist? No - however I did agree and so did devas that he talked too much
6) You guys were having a conversation about the topic RACISM? Yes
7) Is it suspicious that you say context doesn't matter JUST BECAUSE he said that? Yes
8) Do I think something is not right? Yes
9) Do I agree with what Devas said? No because he went too far in giving an example
10) If someone said for example if u say xyz that is considered racist is someone saying the xyz them trying to be offensive/racist? No - but again devas still agrees he did talk too much

I am not saying anything or "arguing" with "you" because he is my "Friend"

I am simply just standing up for what I see is right I do not think it's right that knowing the topic of the convo, your history together, the suspicious chat message of him saying to record and you trying to pm him SOMETHING, and also the fact that the video ended even tho the conversation went on is EXTREMELY SUSPICIOUS and I do personally believe that he was set up and I feel like based on all the info you both provided, well mainly him cause you didn't wanna specify anything other than " he said xyz " I feel like you guys were having a controversial convo where you recorded which is all fine but why was the video cut short and what was said before is all "context" that is missing which is why this "evidence" is really biased in my opinion because you have someone you hate saying something "racist" in your view but you guys were talking about racism which again I don't know why you guys were doing that in the first place.

IF he was racist from the beginning the recording would've started at the beginning of the convo and even ur evidence shows he continued to talk so potentially he gave more "Evidence" to back ur claim but the fact that u cut that out makes it suspicious and I just don't feel like that is being factored in so therefore I am speaking on it because I don't think its fair 4 people 2 of which are friends and dislike the main target since all 3 of u corleones seem friends, have a controversial convo where the only bit of convo you are willing to talk about is what he said, not what was said before or after or anything else

your whole argument is "he said this" but not why he said it or what you said or why you guys were even there