Camorro declares war on Lucky 7... Or not?
#71
(06-02-2018, 07:03 PM)Awestruck Wrote: What annoys me the most is how personally some people take clan politics like this. It should all be in character, yet some people still get offended and take it too far.

There is no conspiracy. A lot of of things have stayed the same honestly compared to the last set of guidelines. Just very bad timing to have them released obviously. There was no intention of trying to "loophole".

Funny you say it should be kept IC, keeping it IC would have hurt lucky 7 so they did what they did OOC to change that.
perqe
Donator

[Image: PywvXUS.gif]
#72
(06-02-2018, 07:03 PM)Awestruck Wrote: What annoys me the most is how personally some people take clan politics like this. It should all be in character, yet some people still get offended and take it too far.

There is no conspiracy. A lot of of things have stayed the same honestly compared to the last set of guidelines. Just very bad timing to have them released obviously. There was no intention of trying to "loophole".

The only reason it has gone OOC is because of a stupid rule that has been implenmented too defend Lucky.
#73
I can understand people's frustration with the new guidelines being added which has obviously caused some backlash, I did recommend introducing them after we sorted the Lucky 7 & Camorro situation but it was pushed ahead after the team had a discussion.

Just thinking in plain, real terms it's not really fair is it? Jan obviously you have the drive to shut down Lucky 7 which, with no disrespect would be a walk in the park for Camorro. Forgee is at the table handling bets with 3 customers and 10 Camorro members come in with rifles, shoot the place up, kill the VIP and they can't really fight back. It's not really a fighting clan, I believe many of you are driven to simply shut down Lucky 7 but aren't thinking in a logical sense.

In reality I don't think Grosvenors Casinos in real life keep a back stash of war equipment...
The following 1 user Likes DVN's post:
  • Joe Joe
#74
It’s not about what is fair, it’s about what is right. If you have the guts to trashtalk clans that are much bigger then you and even ignore the warnings then you should have the balls to face the consequences, and I can assure you, regardless of the outcome of this situation there will be huge consequences for Lucky 7.

And no, in reality casinos don’t have a stash of war equipment, but in real life casinos do not mess with the mafia, because if they do they know they are done for.
The following 11 users Like Jan's post:
  • Lewwings, , Decay, Yonno, Eclipze, Santaliz, Random, Envy, Byra, Falc, General Rickets
#75
(06-03-2018, 11:15 AM)DVN Wrote: I can understand people's frustration with the new guidelines being added which has obviously caused some backlash, I did recommend introducing them after we sorted the Lucky 7 & Camorro situation but it was pushed ahead after the team had a discussion.

Just thinking in plain, real terms it's not really fair is it? Jan obviously you have the drive to shut down Lucky 7 which, with no disrespect would be a walk in the park for Camorro. Forgee is at the table handling bets with 3 customers and 10 Camorro members come in with rifles, shoot the place up, kill the VIP and they can't really fight back. It's not really a fighting clan, I believe many of you are driven to simply shut down Lucky 7 but aren't thinking in a logical sense.

In reality I don't think Grosvenors Casinos in real life keep a back stash of war equipment...

Lucky 7 has guards? I heard they're a force to be reckoned with!

This is why it's stupid. Forggee should know that before acting like a twat to Cammaro with one worded replies.

They should get what they deserve.
The following 6 users Like User 12049's post:
  • Yonno, JackZ, Eclipze, Byra, Grape, General Rickets
#76
Objectively speaking, I found this article on Google.
So everything is possible as Jan specifies ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Monte...ino_attack

[Image: casino-1800.jpg]
[Image: JmCzDqB.png]
The following 2 users Like Generation's post:
  • JackZ, mintblackbeard
#77
(06-03-2018, 11:15 AM)DVN Wrote: I can understand people's frustration with the new guidelines being added which has obviously caused some backlash, I did recommend introducing them after we sorted the Lucky 7 & Camorro situation but it was pushed ahead after the team had a discussion.

Just thinking in plain, real terms it's not really fair is it? Jan obviously you have the drive to shut down Lucky 7 which, with no disrespect would be a walk in the park for Camorro. Forgee is at the table handling bets with 3 customers and 10 Camorro members come in with rifles, shoot the place up, kill the VIP and they can't really fight back. It's not really a fighting clan, I believe many of you are driven to simply shut down Lucky 7 but aren't thinking in a logical sense.

In reality I don't think Grosvenors Casinos in real life keep a back stash of war equipment...

How is the way Forgee replied Camorro's fault? All he had to do was set up a little meeting and they could have came to an agreement, but instead he acted the way he acted and there's consequence for that. But then suddenly the rules changed in the middle of one of the first big conflicts in ages and prevented it from happening! Nobody can say that there wasn't any mischief going on here, Lucky 7 have pretty much tarnished their reputation OOC, but as those threads were IC the conflict should continue.

Imma lol with rickets too.
The following 1 user Likes JackZ's post:
  • Byra
#78
Right well my question is this.
If the new guidelines were not implemented to protect Lucky7, why wasn't the slightest bit of wit and sense used to think "Oh wait, this could affect the ongoing feud between Camorro and lucky 7, best we postpone those changes and let the situation play out!" ?
People start taking accountability for your own actions and not hiding behind someone else.

I also lol with rickets.
The following 6 users Like Mustang's post:
  • JackZ, Eclipze, Byra, Wolven, General Rickets, mintblackbeard
#79
Typical Fearless.

Staff member has a passive clan so it will be protected no matter what, I’m not shocked.

We all know why Forgee was cocky on the thread now because he knew either or that he’s protected with his pathetic little clan.
The following 1 user Likes Falc's post:
  • Eclipze
#80
The fruits have been given to the ally but they to do not take our gifts. This disrespect has been taken and our actions, due to our state of power, should've been expected. The children work hard for the fruits and therefore they should get their reward. The fruits are powerful.


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)