EU help for Poland, refugees crisis

Baskingner

(09-01-2017, 11:56 AM)Sharpshooter Wrote:
(09-01-2017, 11:23 AM)Baskingner Wrote:
(09-01-2017, 11:10 AM)Doctor KuLa Wrote:
(09-01-2017, 11:05 AM)Baskingner Wrote:
(09-01-2017, 10:30 AM)Sharpshooter Wrote: Do you even like, know history?
1)Netherlands was not neutral during WW2
2)Belgian Resistance survived
3)Germany didm't fight Soviets at 1919, Germany didn't even have armed forces at 1919
4)France didn't survive until US joined the war

1)Netherlands was not neutral during WW2 - I was talking about WW1, and so was KuLa.

I can forgive you for misreading the first thing, but what is point 2 to 4 about? Theyre all false, and shockingly false at that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I

Read this and inform yourself before posting stuff in a serious discussion you know little about.

World War I: 1914-1918
World War II: 1939-1945

And I was talking about this (1919-1921) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish%E2%80%93Soviet_War
Poland saved europe for second/third time.

Its beyond me how you can claim that Poland saved modern day Europe in that war, read the wiki page you send me and tell me how the Soviet Union would conquer the whole of Europe following the defeat of Poland. Keep telling yourself that Poland saved the EU, and even if that was true (since we are deviating from the topic at hand here) just because you 'saved' us almost a 100 years ago you should receive special treatment now? I dont think so.

I am not Polish so you can't say you and Polish with me, however I never said Poland saved Europe or deserves special treatment. I just said that your argument is not based on facts

I was referencing to Docter KuLa, hence me quoting him and not you. I dont see the point of bringing up a war that happened a hundred years ago if youre not appealing for some sort of special treatment due to that war.