Unextend my ban/UBR if my ban exceeds 2 days.

Cate

Your name: |FTG| Sgt. Cate Shekelberg

Your ban ID: STEAM_0:1:65460229

Banned by: [FL] Enzyme.

Reason: Sharing pornographic link in advert. Was warned about this previously.

Involved: Nobody.

Why we should unban you: My ban was extended for 3 days, the obvious reason being that I was warned before. But that's not a legitimate reason, I was warned before and banned afterwards. You can't just skip around exrtending bans for such reasons, it makes no legitimate sense.

**Enzyme**

You had been warned against doing this the day before, and you ignored this administrators warning.
When I confronted you; you said you did it because of "banter".

You know better than to advert adult-sites, and you were even lucky enough to receive a warning about this earlier on. You went against the warning and that's why the ban was extended.

I see absolutely no reason as to why you should have your ban reduced or removed.

**Nacreas**

I remember explicitly warning you in OOC about sending links the day before. Common sense would have told you not to advertise what you did in OOC.

Now the ban was extended because you were warned not to do that the day before.

Cate

(04-08-2015, 07:11 PM)Enzyme Wrote: You had been warned against doing this the day before, and you ignored this administrators warning.
When I confronted you; you said you did it because of "banter".

You know better than to advert adult-sites, and you were even lucky enough to receive a warning about this earlier on. You went against the warning and that's why the ban was extended.

I see absolutely no reason as to why you should have your ban reduced or removed.

Extending it makes as much sense as putting a repeat litterer to death row. A warning is a warning, a ban is a ban.

Cate

(04-08-2015, 07:14 PM)Nacreas Wrote: I remember explicitly warning you in OOC about sending links the day before. Common sense would have told you not to advertise what you did in OOC.

Now the ban was extended because you were warned not to do that the day before.

No memory of this happening. Again my point still stands, this makes as much sense as putting a repeat litterer on death row, it's unwarranted "HURR HURR WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN! AUGH NOT THE CHILDREN!" reputation based bs done only to make seem as if you're attempting to protect people by extending punishments.

**Enzyme**

Denied.

User broke the rules. Ban is valid.