De-accept the third person suggestion
#5
Firstly, there are multiple things that I had mentioned in the thread that go to show why 3rd should be disabled when only using a firearm.

My first point had been accuracy, which is increased to make recoil non-existent in the event that they right click while in third person. Lets be honest, you really think someone is going to not do that?

Secondly, there is the issue of having more than a 180 degree view. (Meaning you can see people sneaking up on you, and farther than you would realistically be able to see through first person.)

Thirdly, there is the issue of being able to look around corners, over walls and such without putting yourself in harms way. This is VERY unrealistic and only leads to the game of who wants to jump out of the corner first. It is frequently one of the main things that is abused in 3rd person and brings a sense of unfairness to combat.

My fourth point is the benefits of making first person combat the only option. Not only does it increase the realism, actually require a sense of skill but it also makes it so that people are going to be less likely to go on the oh-so-loved raids without an actual team. Making it first person is going to require teamwork (Covering different angles, watching your flanks) and make the whole system a LOT more fun.

I get that YOU have an issue with it, but myself and many others can agree that it is the smart thing to do. This is not a raiding server and thus you shouldn't be too concerned with a change occurring to make combat more realistic/difficult. 


Messages In This Thread
De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 04:01 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by Nevy - 12-02-2014, 04:16 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 04:34 PM
De-accept the third person suggestion - by Temar - 12-02-2014, 04:18 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 04:36 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 04:41 PM
De-accept the third person suggestion - by Smex - 12-02-2014, 04:44 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 04:47 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 05:10 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 05:17 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 05:20 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 05:26 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 05:55 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 06:03 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 08:57 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 09:20 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 09:19 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 09:53 PM
De-accept the third person suggestion - by Smex - 12-02-2014, 11:03 PM
De-accept the third person suggestion - by Smex - 12-02-2014, 11:44 PM
De-accept the third person suggestion - by Smex - 12-03-2014, 07:55 AM
De-accept the third person suggestion - by Obay - 12-03-2014, 08:56 AM
De-accept the third person suggestion - by Smex - 12-03-2014, 10:33 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)