Spaghetti Cat and RainbÃ¶w

~~earl~~

Rainböw Spaghetti Cat

STEAM_0:0:39232713 STEAM_0:0:25326672

4:51 PM EST

v2d

Walked to tides and saw that somebody had doors named SoulRipper, soul was not on.

Video of RDM and the doors

Screenshot showing they are his doors.

Screenshot showing no SoulRipper ingame. Top to half of board

Screenshot showing no SoulRipper ingame. half to bottom

Jacob1029

Your point?
My name is not Soulripper, I can choose anyname for my doors I want.

Any rule against this in the rules or guide?

Also note the youtube video, "how many times do I have to tell you".
That was the 2nd time you came in, straight after the first time you died. We asked you to leave many times.

~~earl~~

(05-18-2012, 09:08 PM)Jacob1029 Wrote: Your point?
My name is not Soulripper, I can choose anyname for my doors I want.

Any rule against this in the rules or guide?

Also note the youtube video, "how many times do I have to tell you".
That was the 2nd time you came in, straight after the first time you died. We asked you to leave many times.

I waited 5 minutes and went back. Get a video of me 'breaking' NLR then post it. And you were using SoulRipper's name to impersonate on your doors. Let the admins decide your fate.

Jacob1029

The admins can check the logs if you wish, you waited 40 secounds.
Like I Said, check the rules.
I mean if it's against them , I'm sorry I didn't know. But it isn't in the rules so how could I?

**beflok**

It is certainly not against the rules... I am sure soul would not appreciate this though so dont do it again.

My question is why is spaghetti cat just come up crowbarring earl when he is just standing in the public not doing anything...?

Jacob1029

"how many times do I have to tell you"
He kept coming in when we opened the fading door to let me/friends in and then knocking on the doors basically trolling.
This was the 2nd time he came back breaking nlr.

Oh and it wasn't a public place, we owned the hotel and were constructing.

**beflok**

Ban request denied this is not a sufficient amount of evidence to justify a ban.