Posts: 5,104
Threads: 237
Likes Received: 3,608 in 1,515 posts
Likes Given: 2,992
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation:
69
Country:
07-26-2018, 01:59 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
I think the floor one should be changed to defences that chance the height of the defender rapidly. It sounds like I cannot have any raised floors at all with the current wording.
Pollux
Fearless Management
__________________________________________________________________
Posts: 3,580
Threads: 489
Likes Received: 5,468 in 1,449 posts
Likes Given: 2,315
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
79
Country:
07-26-2018, 02:04 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
(07-26-2018, 01:59 AM)Pollux Wrote: I think the floor one should be changed to defences that chance the height of the defender rapidly. It sounds like I cannot have any raised floors at all with the current wording.
That is the case.
Posts: 4,787
Threads: 313
Likes Received: 3,309 in 1,540 posts
Likes Given: 2,435
Joined: Jun 2011
Reputation:
86
Country:
07-26-2018, 02:07 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community. Edited 2 times in total.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
You need to reword the rule about doomforting. To many people that won't make any sense.
Define "impair" in correlation to doomforting. What is any height?
Make it simpler or add a definition/explanation alongside it. I myself aren't a hundred per cent sure what you mean by this rule.
Does this mean you can't base at the middle apartment in slums anymore?
07-26-2018, 04:38 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community. Edited 2 times in total.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
Not sure what you mean by the new doomfort rule.
Can you show screenshots of what you mean?
(I get the concept but I don't see how someone going up or down is doomfort)
Also does it now mean the president can go to 39% tax and not get raided? Because that's what it sounds like.
Posts: 5,372
Threads: 190
Likes Received: 3,551 in 1,917 posts
Likes Given: 1,335
Joined: Nov 2013
Reputation:
96
07-26-2018, 07:09 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
Why do you need to over complicate metagaming?
The rule was fine and simple, worked how it should’ve and most followed it for how many years?
Honestly have no idea why you’ve over complicated it and changed it, pointless.
Good luck enforcing it.
Posts: 1,871
Threads: 108
Likes Received: 574 in 472 posts
Likes Given: 1,131
Joined: Jan 2016
Country:
07-26-2018, 07:45 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
I wonder if there is any members that got banned due to one of these rules not being specific enough. Nice police rule.
Posts: 1,886
Threads: 52
Likes Received: 1,050 in 622 posts
Likes Given: 203
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation:
20
Country:
07-26-2018, 07:49 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
The new meta gaming rule is worded awkwardly so it sounds like a loophole waiting to be exploited. Most people get ic info from ooc via coms then pretend to get it from ic anyway so at least now we acknowledge that.
Posts: 2,636
Threads: 234
Likes Received: 1,358 in 884 posts
Likes Given: 1,159
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation:
33
Country:
07-26-2018, 07:55 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
(07-26-2018, 04:38 AM)GHOSTK1LL3R Wrote: Not sure what you mean by the new doomfort rule.
Can you show screenshots of what you mean?
(I get the concept but I don't see how someone going up or down is doomfort)
Also does it now mean the president can go to 39% tax and not get raided? Because that's what it sounds like.
"You cannot raid the President solely to earn money, because of high taxes (unless it's above 20%)"
The only addition to that rule is that if it is 40%, they have to act like a dictator. Personally, I think it should be over 35% because if it is 39%, there isn't much to lose in terms of income but they also don't have to be a dictator.
07-26-2018, 07:58 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(07-26-2018, 07:55 AM)Bob Bobbington Wrote: (07-26-2018, 04:38 AM)GHOSTK1LL3R Wrote: Not sure what you mean by the new doomfort rule.
Can you show screenshots of what you mean?
(I get the concept but I don't see how someone going up or down is doomfort)
Also does it now mean the president can go to 39% tax and not get raided? Because that's what it sounds like.
"You cannot raid the President solely to earn money, because of high taxes (unless it's above 20%)"
The only addition to that rule is that if it is 40%, they have to act like a dictator. Personally, I think it should be over 35% because if it is 39%, there isn't much to lose in terms of income but they also don't have to be a dictator.
Yea that why im confused about it. I'd even say over 30% IMO as 5% still isn't that much.
The following 1 user Likes User 12049's post:
• Bobby
Posts: 2,350
Threads: 42
Likes Received: 2,489 in 1,061 posts
Likes Given: 612
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation:
45
07-26-2018, 08:19 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community. Edited 1 time in total.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
(07-26-2018, 02:07 AM)equal Wrote: You need to reword the rule about doomforting. To many people that won't make any sense.
Define "impair" in correlation to doomforting. What is any height?
Make it simpler or add a definition/explanation alongside it. I myself aren't a hundred per cent sure what you mean by this rule.
![[Image: SczbtKb.png]](https://i.imgur.com/SczbtKb.png)
Does this mean you can't base at the middle apartment in slums anymore?
Pretty sure he means those 1 PHX plates that people shove into the ground in the middle of hallways etc to put attackers off their aim. See example below:
As for president taxes, they'll have to be clarified because people would just sit on 39%.
Regards,
Thanks to Envy for the signature.
|