[03/03/2016] Official standing on dictatorships
DreeBott Offline
:)
***
Posts: 2,617
Threads: 182
Likes Received: 969 in 521 posts
Likes Given: 1,842
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 40
#42
12-16-2016, 05:39 PM (This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:05 AM by Fearless Community. Edit Reason: Checked Encoding )
(12-11-2016, 11:16 PM)arpanettic Wrote: Q: Is it allowed - to say that the DICKtator bans cars due to crashes or pollution. Would having these cars be parked inside the city but not driven be allowed as they won't cause either issues

Yeah. it's allowed to ban cars, even if you're not a Dictator.
You only need a good reason (Crash rate went up, pollution...)
Find


Messages In This Thread
RE: Official standing on dictatorships - by cnr - 11-13-2013, 10:26 PM
RE: Official standing on dictatorships - by Narc - 11-13-2013, 11:49 PM
RE: Official standing on dictatorships - by Narc - 11-14-2013, 06:26 AM
RE: Official standing on dictatorships - by Adman - 11-14-2013, 07:20 AM
RE: Official standing on dictatorships - by Jono - 11-14-2013, 08:02 AM
RE: Official standing on dictatorships - by Narc - 11-14-2013, 10:07 AM
RE: Official standing on dictatorships - by Narc - 11-14-2013, 01:43 PM
RE: Official standing on dictatorships - by Jan - 11-14-2013, 05:53 PM
RE: Official standing on dictatorships - by Ryder - 11-14-2013, 06:45 PM
RE: Official standing on dictatorships - by Narc - 11-15-2013, 10:47 AM
RE: Official standing on dictatorships - by Ciryl - 12-07-2013, 09:26 PM
RE: [03/03/2016] Official standing on dictatorships - by User 12049 - 03-03-2016, 01:35 PM
RE: [03/03/2016] Official standing on dictatorships - by DreeBott - 12-16-2016, 05:39 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Contact Us | Fearless Forums | Return to Top | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication