Player Report - Rims, Zulu and Blue

[Rims]

You litterally admitted to  shoting me because I was a rebel and was armed. You guys engaged first and raided me. Also we knew you were not unarmed hence we pulled wepaons in Fear of a mugging etc. https://plays.tv/video/5baa977348ffd0c5a0/he-had-an-ak
I understand that it may have looked like we were gonna kill him but we did not yet engage on you, It would be fine if we did. I know its instinct to defend your fellow team, but we did not engage yet, Because we run at u with guns dosnt mean we are a direct threat and rule 3.1a was broken. You could of easily said u had snipers watching us Etc. and worked out a peaceful solution. As you did later on in the day when a rebel raided you so you came to speak with me as I was the leader!

Also- Rims- Quit with the jokes, we all know after I win this PR I will be the Forum King

The more you post, the more you show just how bullshit this entire PR is. lmfaoo I love this.


"You guys engaged first and raided me."


I've literally demonstrated what the word "raid" means definitionally, and yet you're still throwing it around. I know you're dumb, but I can't tell if you actually believe 2 people shooting guns at eachother is "raiding", regardless of circumstances or location. You're simply categorically wrong here. It's not up for interpretation, you are objectively incorrect in this being a "raid". You left your house to kill Blue in a house that nobody owned. If you had stayed in your house and we tried breaking in to kill you/steal from you,
T h e n   t h a t   w o u l d   b e   a   r a i d.



"but we did not yet engage on you"

So you don't even deny that you put on assault rifles, and sprinted at my friend to kill him? You're admitting (You also use this phrase in your own video, thanks for that) that you hadn't "YET" engaged (You use the word "shot" in your video. "We didn't even shoot yet")

So you're proving that we were completely justified in neutralizing you before you had a chance to kill Blue. Thank you, sir. You made this a lot easier.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Also we knew you were not unarmed hence we pulled wepaons in Fear of a mugging etc. https://plays.tv/video/5baa977348ffd0c5a0/he-had-an-ak"

Rewatch this video. 
"This guy has a fucking AK!..... I'm pretty sure."
No. You didn't "know" we were armed. The person saying we had an AK is just wrong, and as we've told you; NOBODY HAD UNCONCEALED WEAPONS. (Except me, you never found me. I had an AWP.) The person calling that out doesn't even sound positive, and yet you use that as the auspice to put on AR's and rush us. Incredible.

Also, if you were afraid of being mugged, why would you run AT the person that you're afraid is gonna mug you? lmfao 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


"Because we run at u with guns dosnt mean we are a direct threat and rule 3.1a was broken"

Aside from this sentence sounding so oxymoronic and stupid, I actually believe you're dumb enough to not see the irony here...

Look back at my first reply on my thread, You know, the one where I give you a list of other things you could have done if you were a "passiveRP"??? Call the cops? Go inside your homes and lock the door??? Ask us why we're there without holding AR's in your hands!!?!?!  

NOPE. You put on Assault Rifles and rush at us, as a first reaction, you admit that you were going to engage us. So it sounds like you're admitting that you were gonna take Rule 3.1a and shove it up your stupid ass, huh? lmfao nice try buddy.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"You could of easily said u had snipers watching us Etc. and worked out a peaceful solution."


Lying in the courthouse. You never gave Blue a chance to speak to you, because you sprinted over and started yelling "HANDS UP HANDS UP HANDS UP HANDS UP" Which completely contradicts your previous statement about how much you cherish 3.1a. At this point, it has been proven beyond a shadow of doubt that you were going to kill him/hostage if we hadn't prevented that. 

It almost sounds like you were gonna use violence as your first reaction....



Alright i'm done. I've comprehensively demonstrated how every single point you hold on this situation is objectively false. I feel that it is very easy to see just how inept this child is.