Character
Rules
Events
Map
RP Points
Proplimits
Statistics
Steam Group
Members
Hall of Fame
Team
Bans
Blacklists
Warnings
Changelog
Content
08-04-2016, 06:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:05 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
Personally, I dont fully like this change.
Granted, I do not know if what I am going to say is actually included in this rule and if it is then I like the change.
I do not believe a player who believes he is involved, but actually isnt deserves a 50% punishment. For example, if I feel I am involved in a case but I am considered by the administration team not to be involved, I feel like I do not deserve a 50% warning level. I feel this new rule should only be in process to players who are knowingly breaking the not involved rule to write something and that is it.
Granted, I do not know if what I am going to say is actually included in this rule and if it is then I like the change.
I do not believe a player who believes he is involved, but actually isnt deserves a 50% punishment. For example, if I feel I am involved in a case but I am considered by the administration team not to be involved, I feel like I do not deserve a 50% warning level. I feel this new rule should only be in process to players who are knowingly breaking the not involved rule to write something and that is it.