Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts
#44
(08-01-2016, 04:51 PM)Agorith Wrote:
(08-01-2016, 04:46 PM)Mist Wrote:
(08-01-2016, 03:58 PM)Agorith Wrote:
(08-01-2016, 03:15 PM)Adam James Wrote:
(08-01-2016, 03:06 PM)Agorith Wrote: Nobody's telling you to start a flame war, just be a decent person with a decent IQ and you'll be able to have plenty of valuable discussions with people.

So you basically just called him a retard.

Those are your words aren't they?
I never called him anything of the sorts, rather just made clear that with those 2 things you've got enough to have valuable discussions.
I'm sure his IQ is fine.
[Image: 03ad1c613f.png]

What are you here for again partaking in this conversation when you only attempt to startle people?

Sorry Mr. "Dank Administrator". I didn't mean to startle you? lol.


Messages In This Thread
RE: Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts - by Mist - 08-01-2016, 05:06 PM
RE: Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts - by User 19014 - 08-01-2016, 02:15 PM
RE: Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts - by User 19014 - 08-01-2016, 02:43 PM
RE: Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts - by Create - 08-04-2016, 04:38 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)