Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts
#7
(08-01-2016, 11:18 AM)Random Wrote:
(08-01-2016, 11:16 AM)Falc Wrote: That's so much bullshit lmao.

I can't tell if this is meant as a joke or not, maybe get control over the community rather than turning it into more of a prison.

I feel like this was the right decision to make, simply because of the fact that there has been a lot of uninvolved people posting in the courthouse. (Like Avgar already said in the original thread)

The rules are there for a reason, shouldn't be too hard to follow them.

So then keep to the warning system like it's been for years, so what if someone posts and not involved? Is it too much hard work for staff to warn them and remove the post?


Messages In This Thread
RE: Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts - by Falc - 08-01-2016, 11:19 AM
RE: Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts - by User 19014 - 08-01-2016, 02:15 PM
RE: Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts - by User 19014 - 08-01-2016, 02:43 PM
RE: Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts - by Create - 08-04-2016, 04:38 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)