03-18-2016, 01:07 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
If you're going to make that argument that something that is not included would be thrown out, you are saying the supreme court's ruling on homosexual marriage should have been thrown out because you can't interpret rules to include something that is not there.
Things such as that do not always get thrown out. Think of the rules as the constitution. Think of us staff as the Supreme Court. We interpret the rules and unlike the Supreme Court we enforce them as well.
Hitman
Fearless Administrator
Things such as that do not always get thrown out. Think of the rules as the constitution. Think of us staff as the Supreme Court. We interpret the rules and unlike the Supreme Court we enforce them as well.
Hitman
Fearless Administrator