Character
Rules
Events
Map
RP Points
Proplimits
Statistics
Steam Group
Members
Hall of Fame
Team
Bans
Blacklists
Warnings
Changelog
Content
01-13-2016, 01:03 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
I would also like to add that I've spent a lot of money on this game, even though it isn't about that but that's not the point, 450+ hours of my life have gone into this game, building a clan, building friendships... I am a dedicated player and also a loyal member of the community, although some of you may hold personal grudges against me, I think removing me permanently from the community is unjust. I've already stated my final warning was void because of soul so i shouldn't even have been banned because of the last chance and should only have received the same punishment as the rest of the offenders.
Please, look st it from that perspective, the final warning was not valid, so should I really receive a perm ban for a violation of 12.7?
I've only had a small pick of previous bans and I consider fearless to be a large part of my entertainment outside work.
But when you look at it like this, the whole case does not make sense..
- Final warning received for 2nd ban - DDoS joke
- Final warning REMOVED by Soul as Hitman also joked about DDoS and was not even punished, this was witnessed by multiple staff members - are staff exempt from the rules?
- 3rd ban was for backseat admin of which a final warning was then applied, this does not make sense for a third ban, considering the last one was completely removed.
- now been banned for 12.7 and received a perm due to a final warning
The final warning makes no sense being applied on a 3rd ban for backseat admin, am I not correct on thinking players normally receive final warnings after around 10 bans? It may have been agreed by the staff team, but on what grounds? The previous final warning was removed so what grounds were there to add a final warning onto a third ban.
It makes no sense
Thank you for your time, goodnight.
Please, look st it from that perspective, the final warning was not valid, so should I really receive a perm ban for a violation of 12.7?
I've only had a small pick of previous bans and I consider fearless to be a large part of my entertainment outside work.
But when you look at it like this, the whole case does not make sense..
- Final warning received for 2nd ban - DDoS joke
- Final warning REMOVED by Soul as Hitman also joked about DDoS and was not even punished, this was witnessed by multiple staff members - are staff exempt from the rules?
- 3rd ban was for backseat admin of which a final warning was then applied, this does not make sense for a third ban, considering the last one was completely removed.
- now been banned for 12.7 and received a perm due to a final warning
The final warning makes no sense being applied on a 3rd ban for backseat admin, am I not correct on thinking players normally receive final warnings after around 10 bans? It may have been agreed by the staff team, but on what grounds? The previous final warning was removed so what grounds were there to add a final warning onto a third ban.
It makes no sense
Thank you for your time, goodnight.