Poll: If a player takes reasonable and justified action to prevent calamity on the server, should they be punished?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
44.12%
 15 44.12%
No
55.88%
 19 55.88%
Total 34 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Rule 1.9 [backseat administration]
mintblackbeard Offline
Administrator
*******
Administrator
Posts: 2,165
Threads: 120
Likes Received: 896 in 577 posts
Likes Given: 1,776
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation: 52
Country: United Kingdom
#26
12-16-2015, 05:46 PM (This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community. Edit Reason: Checked Encoding )
In my opinion one of the best reasons against it is misunderstanding the rules. How would you like it if you were tied up and locked in a room for doing something that the other person thought was rule breaking but really isn't. That's why we have admins and moderators. They know the rules and they know what for and why they're punishing someone.
[Image: bArZFeZ.png]
The following 2 users Like mintblackbeard's post:
  • aDisabledDeer, Holdem
Find


Messages In This Thread
RE: Rule 1.9 [backseat administration] - by Balls - 12-09-2015, 12:20 PM
RE: Rule 1.9 [backseat administration] - by Falc - 12-09-2015, 12:50 PM
RE: Rule 1.9 [backseat administration] - by Spear - 12-09-2015, 01:13 PM
RE: Rule 1.9 [backseat administration] - by Spear - 12-09-2015, 01:19 PM
RE: Rule 1.9 [backseat administration] - by Emil - 12-09-2015, 02:44 PM
RE: Rule 1.9 [backseat administration] - by Tomo - 12-09-2015, 04:18 PM
RE: Rule 1.9 [backseat administration] - by Reebs - 12-16-2015, 12:25 PM
RE: Rule 1.9 [backseat administration] - by mintblackbeard - 12-16-2015, 05:46 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Contact Us | Fearless Forums | Return to Top | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication