08-02-2015, 01:58 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
(08-02-2015, 01:51 AM)Baskingner Wrote: So this has been bothering me for a while, and i have spoken to an ex-staffmember about it but i would like to hear an answer on this:If I recall correctly the choices were literally keep 3rd person shooting or remove the new weapons. I mean you can still shoot in 3rd person there is just no longer a reticle. Point is 3rd person made guns too accurate and overpowered. It was a smart decision, with the new weapons the same problem arose and it was just about time to get rid of the reticle. There was ways of literally never missing with rifles that should have enormous spread and recoil.
The administrators are complaining that Soul is overriding their decisions, basicly making calls on his own. If thats the case, i understand its frustrating to work under such circumstances but why are you complaining? You did it yourself a while back as administrator.
A while back this community voted with a majority of 66% to keep 3rd person shooting in and guess what? The admin team overrode that decision and told the community that, despite being a minority, it was important to remove that "bug". Hell, an admin even told me that my opinion didnt matter because the staffteam was making all the calls.
Isnt that a bit hypocritic?
Edit: I should include that this problem was not just with the new weapons, it occurred with the old ones as well.