De-accept the third person suggestion
#81
(12-02-2014, 09:30 PM)Jan Wrote:
(12-02-2014, 09:26 PM)General Rickets Wrote: My point is in third you abuse the fact that you can look around corners without going around them. Same goes with looking over props. I think this is the third time I've said this.

What you are basicly saying over and over again is that all third person games are bugs then? These arguments make no sense whatsoever.

Using third person to look over walls and around corners is an unfair and unrealistic advantage.

Just because some games have this mechanic doesn't mean it's fair and realistic.

There's a reason why I only play on DayZ servers where the third person is disabled, and that's because too many people cheat with the third person. It simply grants an unfair and unrealistic advantage over you.


I love using the third person for gunfights in FL, because it's the easiest and best way to do it. It might be unfair against those who don't use it but that's how it's always been.
If we were to force everyone to have gunfights in first person then this would make it more fair for everyone as you know the other guy wouldn't use third person to get an unfair advantage.

Now, if we were to add a proper weapon pack to FL (looks nice and has better weapon-mechanics and gun-play) then I wouldn't really mind the loss of third person.

The issue with loosing third person is that the weapons are old and of low quality. We should replace the weapon-models the same way we've replaced the vehicle models.


Changing the weapon-models is something that we're currently discussing on the staff-team.
Sincerely, Enzyme
Ex-Supervising Administrator
The following 4 users Like Enzyme's post:
  • Smex, General Rickets, NotSep, Nevy


Messages In This Thread
De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 04:01 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 04:34 PM
De-accept the third person suggestion - by Temar - 12-02-2014, 04:18 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 04:36 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 04:41 PM
De-accept the third person suggestion - by Smex - 12-02-2014, 04:44 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 04:47 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 05:10 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 05:17 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 05:20 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 05:26 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 05:55 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 06:03 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 08:57 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 09:20 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 09:19 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by Enzyme - 12-02-2014, 09:36 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 09:53 PM
De-accept the third person suggestion - by Smex - 12-02-2014, 11:03 PM
De-accept the third person suggestion - by Smex - 12-02-2014, 11:44 PM
De-accept the third person suggestion - by Smex - 12-03-2014, 07:55 AM
De-accept the third person suggestion - by Obay - 12-03-2014, 08:56 AM
De-accept the third person suggestion - by Smex - 12-03-2014, 10:33 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)