De-accept the third person suggestion
#16
(12-02-2014, 04:44 PM)Smex Wrote:
(12-02-2014, 04:30 PM)Wood Wrote: It'll really suck turning it off, it's not like people abuse it? Wall banging is sort of a part of raiding, I myself don't do it as I don't use third person as I feel the accuracy is horrible and goes to the wrong angle, but wall banging to look around is a method. Unless you add the ability to poke your head around corners (leaning), then I feel the current "wall bang" system is okay.

Just my opinion, but it'll really cause some people to be upset about it, considering it's never gave anyone a advantage.

Everyone abuses it. This is the problem why raids last centuries, and why it should be removed. Neither is the problem wall banging but looking around walls to see whether they are coming or not. You never have to risk anything in a raid, by removing third person looking around corners then it actually puts a risk into a raid rather than who has a quicker firing gun and can hover a unrealistic crosshair over their target.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is very true, but raids are still won. I have been in multiple raids and have won without any qwarm. All you do is bait their reload and then run. IF they have two weapons stop and shoot them in the head. Third person is a choice, if you don't like third person. Fine. But to make it so that others have to suffer also is unfair and shouldn't be allowed. 


Messages In This Thread
De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 04:01 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 04:34 PM
De-accept the third person suggestion - by Temar - 12-02-2014, 04:18 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 04:36 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 04:41 PM
De-accept the third person suggestion - by Smex - 12-02-2014, 04:44 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 04:47 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 05:10 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 05:17 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 05:20 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 05:26 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 05:55 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 06:03 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 08:57 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 09:20 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 09:19 PM
RE: De-accept the third person suggestion - by User 12049 - 12-02-2014, 09:53 PM
De-accept the third person suggestion - by Smex - 12-02-2014, 11:03 PM
De-accept the third person suggestion - by Smex - 12-02-2014, 11:44 PM
De-accept the third person suggestion - by Smex - 12-03-2014, 07:55 AM
De-accept the third person suggestion - by Obay - 12-03-2014, 08:56 AM
De-accept the third person suggestion - by Smex - 12-03-2014, 10:33 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)