Character
Rules
Events
Map
RP Points
Proplimits
Statistics
Steam Group
Members
Hall of Fame
Team
Bans
Blacklists
Warnings
Changelog
Content
10-01-2014, 12:30 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:03 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
I've seen this same thread a hundred times, and it's always the same argument, and it always ends the same way: people end up taking shots at admin's personal lives and using that as ammo against them, and that I won't stand for. Has it ever occured to you all that a staff presence on the servers is a problem we continually monitor and try and improve? Just turns out that some of our members with a lot of hours, roleplay experience and knowledge of the rules, who would otherwise be considered for promotion, don't get that chance because they spend their time stirring up trouble and causing drama in these threads. If you're going to complain about server staff presence, at least provide us with a valid solution rather than the same tiring argument and drama-baiting a thousand times in a row.
Activity is not the only criteria for a new admin, and sadly many of you don't get that. It requires a mature attitude. Sorry Jarz, but I'm going to use your post to demonstrate. Floodify makes a valid point, and while there's room for mature argument in response, you instead call his attitude pissy, provoke drama and tell him to step down - You then have the cheek to call that criticism, when its just drama-baiting and being immature. If you want people to listen to you, wisen up and give us actual feedback and criticism, rather than having a go at my fellow staff members. The above is the reason you'll probably never see a staff role - Your post makes it seem you care more about drama than FL.
If an admin is inactive for a long time with no reason, we speak to them internally. Sometimes admins have been demoted due to inactivity, other times they step up their game. It's worth nothing that some admins are active in other ways than on the servers; they may not log server hours, but they help manage the forums and make decisions, investigate certain issues, etc.. And other times they simply wish to spend some time to themself, which is completely acceptable.
I'm closing this thread, it's turned from passive-aggressive to blatant drama-baiting. If you have complaints, feel free to send them to my inbox.
Edit: Forgot to close the thread because I'm a mong, bit late now anyway, carry on chaps.
Activity is not the only criteria for a new admin, and sadly many of you don't get that. It requires a mature attitude. Sorry Jarz, but I'm going to use your post to demonstrate. Floodify makes a valid point, and while there's room for mature argument in response, you instead call his attitude pissy, provoke drama and tell him to step down - You then have the cheek to call that criticism, when its just drama-baiting and being immature. If you want people to listen to you, wisen up and give us actual feedback and criticism, rather than having a go at my fellow staff members. The above is the reason you'll probably never see a staff role - Your post makes it seem you care more about drama than FL.
If an admin is inactive for a long time with no reason, we speak to them internally. Sometimes admins have been demoted due to inactivity, other times they step up their game. It's worth nothing that some admins are active in other ways than on the servers; they may not log server hours, but they help manage the forums and make decisions, investigate certain issues, etc.. And other times they simply wish to spend some time to themself, which is completely acceptable.
I'm closing this thread, it's turned from passive-aggressive to blatant drama-baiting. If you have complaints, feel free to send them to my inbox.
Edit: Forgot to close the thread because I'm a mong, bit late now anyway, carry on chaps.