ubr

[ilmon3y]

Not involved, warned.

I was present at the time the ban was applied, working with the user who created this thread. I witnessed relevant information to the case, so I believe to be involved. Our intention was to improve our buildings and to improve other peoples works as well. And back when we used a similar method in the presence of Beflok, he showed no concern and didn't believe it to be any trouble.

Funny how I wasn't issued a warning until I criticized the amount of time it took for an administrator's response.

Also, the correct procedure is not to delete the message, but to embolden the fact they're not involved at the bottom, as carried out earlier in this thread.

I'll paraphrase what Doomdude decided to remove from my comment:

I found it unprofessional to leave VallyTeacake's message showing the list of other bans with shorter punishments ignored for over 7 days. Only to receive a measly 2-lined response saying "those cases aren't the same", when they clearly are.