ubr

[WhiteFusion]

User has been warned for this post. Reason:

You're quite mistaken when you claim that people who put hydraulics on cars get a mild punishment. I just issued a year ban for someone who did that, and the only reason it wasn't a permaban was because it was his first ban.

You're not the whole administration team. You make sure that other admins follow their jobs and at the same time do yours. Some admins will be lenient and some won't. Also, you're portraying that you been lenient like others by banning someone for a year instead of the rule stating they should've been permabanned.

The problem here in this case is that you don't realize how you were wrong, and how serious what you did was. You keep making excuses with how harmless the prop you spawned was, but you fail to forsee the possible future uses of this exploit that you were teaching to others.

You keep taking the issue way out of proportion. He's spawning a deactivated explosive that can't do harm to anyone because of it losing the ability to explode. Simply becoming a normal prop like everything else. I can understand the larger objects, but even then some admins will instantly go, "Someone's spaming large props. Ban them."

Banned props are banned props, and you cannot make up excuses to justify why it should be allowed to get around the system to spawn these banned props.

Excluding large props because I talked about it, do you personally think objects that had a dangerous property (explosive) was to be removed due to the exploit warrant a ban because it was a dangerous beforehand?

Not involved. Warned

-Fultz