Character
Rules
Events
Map
RP Points
Proplimits
Statistics
Steam Group
Members
Hall of Fame
Team
Bans
Blacklists
Warnings
Changelog
Content
02-20-2014, 12:07 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:03 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
(02-19-2014, 07:35 PM)ilmon3y Wrote: (It would be far better if you stopped it with the harassment aspect now, since it's beginning to clog up this thread, making it more and more off-topic. Make a separate thread)
Quote: why didn't you disembark from the truck when the shots (which was the equivalent of a full magazine) were fired in the first place?
We did. How would I have even returned the second time if I hadn't exited the truck while you burned a full clip into it? A warming shot doesn't consist of a full magazine, and it's very in-adequate of you to accuse me of lying, when what you said is contradicting to the events that followed.
Because: 1) We -did- exit the truck. 2) You openly admitted trying to kill us the first time by using a full magazine in your UMP.
As both sides have said, the first time was equivalent to the second (shown in the video). One of us walked in, picked up the note, walked back out, and we were almost killed without warning.
The only thing that could be considered provocative would've been just me coming back, being welcomed into the store, and repeating the same actions to receive the same aggressive response. It was purely just to capture evidence of your previous actions, and unless you wish to prove otherwise (with actual evidence instead of "idk what happened exactly the first time but ur still being biased"), no harassment or fear RP was being applied.
To justify, a 'shot' doesn't specifically have to consist of just one round. It can consist of a burst, or in this case a full magazine. I can reinforce the fact that a full magazine was fired, due to the fact that VanillaTeaCakes stated that;
Quote:Chocbar almost certainly fired a full magazine at me).
A single shot would not have made you disembark, as your attitudes at the time were not towards roleplay, but towards ruining our experience. You would have simply driven off.
Instead of pointing fingers stating that my evidence is contradictive, please revise your own evidence in future, as your story is incomplete and thus insufficient to press any charges against me. What happened before the video? There's no hardback evidence. I would like to state that my actions were intentional and I did not randomly deathmatch you. I intentionally engaged you on the final exit from the shop, as theivery of a valuable item, when roleplaying as 'Al Kebab', an organisation with ties to the Bermuda Mafia) would not be dealt with by the police. It would be taken into our own hands.
With all due respect, the fact that you are posting a ban request, implies that you either WANT to get us out of banned out of prejudice (hence the statement made by Dave towards Charlie in OOC "We've got a lot of shit against you.") or that you are upset by the events you experienced in CityRP, since you triggered an aggressive roleplay. Too Bad.
In terms of the scenario, I am willing to apologise for any upset or inconvienience my actions may have caused towards you or anyone involved in the roleplay. However, I will not take responsibility for your death and I am not guilty of random deathmatch.
I am willing to drop the harassment charges, so long as we can put the past few events behind us. I feel it's best we let a member of Fearless staff make input on the current scenario - arguing isn't getting us anywhere.