9/11

[Holdem]

if you REALLY believe FEMA when they talk about 9/11 theories, I suppose you also believe their theory about WTC 7.

No, I do not believe what any type of government/corporation agency has to say about this subject, the fact that I quoted them in one of my responses was using what you believe is "True" against your argument. In this case, you were talking about "50,000 gallons of fuel", yet according to FEMA (A side which you in theory believe since you don't believe that there wasn't any other key factors in the collapsing of the buildings apart from a plane slamming into it) there was only around 3,500 gallons, so really in theory there was 7% of the fuel you say there was, which in my opinion isn't nearly enough to bring a building down, yet damage it's steel structure.

Sorry? I thought that a jet ran into the side of a building as well. Must've been a mistake in my calculations.

Let me reiterate:

The twin towers had a commercial airliner slam into it at 400 KIAS generating a huge amount of energy.

As you both believe that a plane is enough to bring down a building collapsing onto itself and that it was CLEARLY the reason why they were brought down, let us discuss WTC 7. The tower that was not hit by any aircraft yet collapsed like a house of cards. Please tell me how this tower collapsed when there was hardly any fire in it.