2nd Amendment

[Slick Rick]

No in most cases the owner would just be shot if he was home. At least in pretty much all stories I've heard of someone getting robbed.
At least if the homeowner had a gun the right person would have a chance to live.

And Dylan, this isn't Europe. And we will not give up our 2nd amendment right.

Are you for real?
Really?
Do you pay any attention to crime-statistics, the times and how people act? You don't think that a burglar knows the difference between a jail-sentence of years and a lifetime (if not death penalty)? In most cases of burglary the home-owner is killed?
What?
Are you kidding me?
That is just a blatant lie, and it is obvious you pay no attention to facts when you state something. And the homeowner is far more likely to get himself killed if he starts pulling a gun on robbers, than he is saving his property. That and the burglar would have a much harder time getting a gun if they were outlawed.

Chillout dude.

Also, the 2nd amendment WAS formed mainly so we would be able to fight off corruption (AKA a police state).

You honestly think Senators and Presidents are on your side lol? Fox news has got you pretty good. George Bush Sr. himself blatantly talked about a New World Order on TV, WHILE being president. Our dollar bill has the All Seeing Eye on it, and under it in latin reads "A New Secular Order".

That being said, there's no reason for us to be able to buy fully automatic rifles. Same goes for silencers. I'm all for everything else though.