Report:Greed^

**Ranger**

Name of player: [FL:RP]Greed^

SteamID: STEAM_0:1:41161698

Time in GMT: Around 18:00(gmt)

Server:

Summary: He threatened to start a clan war because I and Ratatoskr started to speak, he is bringing OOC things into IC.
The steamchats show that he has threatened to start a clan war with The Washington Family because of our "Association" with Waite
( Ratatoskr has started hanging around with us in ts.) All evidence is from steam chats with SirMinus.
[Image: 342c6cc255f14537a9ae3c5cf4824a9d.png]

Evidence:
[Image: 391859a1e05b4313b88cd97c938f6077.png](The thread that he links:http://www.fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=74153 is in off-topic)
[Image: 4c5dbf1a1e2e4b7a847b4a1d399ea7b2.png]
[Image: 9ed129dc5a6c4c4ca4e7e20a4d9abddc.png]
[Image: e97c256fe75d45588d20dcdd866ff41d.png]
[Image: b76741150853455db120a6d02b6545ef.png]
He is metagaming by threatening to start a IC clan war based on off-topic (OOC) footage.

**Reebs**

I would like to hear Greed^s side of the story before a conclusion is made on this case. Accused user has 24 hours from this post to respond, otherwise a ruling will be made without his statement being given.

Reebs
Fearless Moderator

Greed^

1: was clearly being sarcastic (https://gyazo.com/7f7b14392e1ec78eabfef64852502687)
2: This is steam chat, not considered valid evidence
3: This is just words, no actual rulebreakage has taken place

**Ranger**

(08-15-2016, 07:01 PM)Greed^ Wrote: 1: was clearly being sarcastic (https://gyazo.com/7f7b14392e1ec78eabfef64852502687)
2: This is steam chat, not considered valid evidence
3: This is just words, no actual rulebreakage has taken place

Would you be able to say that "oh I was being sarcastic" if you threatened to ddos the sever and get away with it? NO
You were in game so this makes the evidence valid (Also you said "Washington is next" several times in OOC.

**Reebs**

Thank you for your quick reply, Greed^.

This case is being looked into. Thank you for your patience.

Reebs
Fearless Moderator

Greed^

(08-15-2016, 07:05 PM)Mr.Ranger Wrote:
(08-15-2016, 07:01 PM)Greed^ Wrote: 1: was clearly being sarcastic (https://gyazo.com/7f7b14392e1ec78eabfef64852502687)
2: This is steam chat, not considered valid evidence
3: This is just words, no actual rulebreakage has taken place
Would you be able to say that "oh I was being sarcastic" if you threatened to ddos the sever and get away with it? NO
You were in game so this makes the evidence valid (Also you said "Washington is next" several times in OOC.

Depends if it was meant as a joke or not
Also words are still words, I have not presented this "evidence" to a clan officer, so therefore I have not metagamed

**Ranger**

(08-15-2016, 07:11 PM)Greed^ Wrote:
(08-15-2016, 07:05 PM)Mr.Ranger Wrote:
(08-15-2016, 07:01 PM)Greed^ Wrote: 1: was clearly being sarcastic (https://gyazo.com/7f7b14392e1ec78eabfef64852502687)
2: This is steam chat, not considered valid evidence
3: This is just words, no actual rulebreakage has taken place
Would you be able to say that "oh I was being sarcastic" if you threatened to ddos the sever and get away with it? NO
You were in game so this makes the evidence valid (Also you said "Washington is next" several times in OOC.

Depends if it was meant as a joke or not
Also words are still words, I have not presented this "evidence" to a clan officer, so therefore I have not metagamed

Its under review of admins, lets see what they think.

**Awestruck**

Steam chats are indeed not classed as valid evidence. However, unless Greed actually starts a war for these OOC reasons, it would be metagaming. But, he hasn't, therefore it isn't.

Thank you for your report. If you have any further questions, feel free to send me a PM and I will get back immediately.

Denied.

**Awestruck**

Moved/