![]() |
Tempski - Printable Version +- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net) +-- Forum: The Courthouse (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=13) +--- Forum: Staff Report (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=22) +---- Forum: Closed (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=89) +---- Thread: Tempski (/showthread.php?tid=65076) |
Tempski - Rims - 10-05-2015 Name: Rims & Budy Time/Date: 8:23 PM EST/ 10/5/2015 Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:68782868 Name of Administrator: Tempski Evidence: http://fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=65066 This link in the evidence will direct you to an incident that happened yesterday. It is a bit of a clusterfuck but as you can clearly see, he is incredibly biased with his own personal agenda to the point where he's quite literally incommunicable. Damage logs were presented by Audacter yet he ignores that out of hand and proceeds to go by his own criteria. Providing me with a 30% and Budy with 40% (Budy, who can't even post on the forums now, thanks to Ivan. For disagreeing? Silencing someone only makes yourself look more guilty.) warning for a single post after he immaturely denied the BR. He was shown by Nighthawk to have completely misunderstood the situation; beliving Budy and I were "demanding" damage logs from him, yet he felt competent enough to assess a situation he was not involved in whatsoever. He denied our BR on the grounds that we didn't provide video evidence, yet completely bases his corrupt decision on mere screenshots provided by the accused, when it has been genuinely confirmed that most members in that clan record their game 24/7, presumably for situations just like this. If that is not the sign of complete biased corruption, then we're completely doomed. He seems to have a vendetta against us, or a bias in favor of the group in question in said BR. He has a history in their clan and has had a pretty rocky history with us in terms of approving public builds. Going by his own rules and actually admitting to denying us on things that "Aren't actually rules, but they're just things that people do." This is heresay, but it's worth mentioning. RE: Tempski - Ivan Tempski - 10-05-2015 So where is the abuse here? You didn't supply sufficient evidence, thus it was denied. We do NOT tolerate people who post after mods/admins have denied the case, you will instantly be warned. I don't have a history with them, I was removed from the clan due to classified reasons, I was with them for a day. I am not biased, I was fair, you did not supply enough evidence, thus it was denied. I see no abuse here. RE: Tempski - Rims - 10-05-2015 (10-05-2015, 06:13 PM)Tempski Wrote: So where is the abuse here? Tempski sees nothing wrong with a decision made by Tempski. Shocking. I have said all there is to say from my end. I'll wait for another staff's opinion. RE: Tempski - Ivan Tempski - 10-05-2015 I don't understand. I'm not an abuser. RE: Tempski - Rims - 10-05-2015 (10-05-2015, 06:52 PM)Tempski Wrote: I don't understand. I will try to condense all my points I tried to make in the link I posted under evidence. I do understand that thread turned into a mess so:
"Evidence:: Called Audacter and he checked the logs, said he didn't see it so I should take it to BR, he said he would post caps of the damage logs. " That quote is From Budy's initial post on Awestruck's Ban Request. That was said before anyone replied at all. How you somehow misunderstood that for us "demanding" logs from anyone, let alone you, is hard to understand.
RE: Tempski - Ivan Tempski - 10-05-2015 Having damage logs don't me anything in this case. Okay, he shot you. But where is the evidence that state that awestruck intentionally shot you? Audacter didn't find any reason to ban awestruck, thus it was denied. As for the Warnings. Take me more seriously, I deny the thread, you abide by the courthouse rules. You cannot post after denied. RE: Tempski - Rims - 10-05-2015 (10-05-2015, 07:11 PM)Tempski Wrote: Having damage logs don't me anything. Okay, he shot you. But where is the evidence that state that awestruck intentionally shot you? The number of bullets and the interval in which he was hit? Taking budy down to 3% HP? 3 hits in a second is not being demonstrated as "accidental" when they're screenshots show them having pinpoint accuracy at targets that are even farther away than we were. Try again. How can you also say that damage logs don't mean anything? Isn't that a vital tool of staff in general? Don't you ban people on a daily basis based on information you gain from damage logs? woow. RE: Tempski - Ivan Tempski - 10-05-2015 3 hits in a second demonstrate an accident sir. RE: Tempski - Rims - 10-05-2015 (10-05-2015, 07:16 PM)Tempski Wrote: 3 hits in a second demonstrate an accident sir. Right, so all their other kills must be accidents too. 3 hits in a second at that range basically proves that Awestruck was AIMING DOWN THE FUCKING SIGHT AT BUDY. This new update has made Hip-fire completely unusable. I can't even... RE: Tempski - Ivan Tempski - 10-05-2015 Did he kill you? No Did he kill others because of a raid? Yes, because they were valid, I don't understand what you're getting there. I still fail to see any abuse here, Audacter was on the roof checking logs and failed to see a reason to ban Awestruck, thus it was denied. |