![]() |
wat #2 - Printable Version +- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net) +-- Forum: The Courthouse (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=13) +--- Forum: Unban Request (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=15) +---- Forum: Denied (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=32) +---- Thread: wat #2 (/showthread.php?tid=35700) |
wat #2 - cnr - 08-04-2013 Your name: [FL:RP] Spyderr Your ban ID: 35560 Banned by: Narcotic Reason: breaking fearrp Involved: steven burnett, follay/kolluy and jake14 Why we should unban you: I didn't break any rules, knifed a cop in self defence while being random raided and was banned for "breaking fearrp" Proof from one of the cops that raided me : [Image: GNx7sBD.png] [Image: g01WZ0v.png] If you think the messages are somehow faked I can get him to post here. RE: wat #2 - Burnett - 08-04-2013 Yes I'm one of the cops who raided. Read my Statement above (screenshots) RE: wat #2 - Narc - 08-04-2013 Somebody has to read courthouse rules. Denied unban request: http://www.fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=35690 Either way, case escalated for SA review. RE: wat #2 - cnr - 08-04-2013 I know it's against the rules but "Either way, case escalated for SA review." that is ALL I wanted. A different admin to review the situation and deny/accept it. I appreciate your time and effort admining etc but I think it's fair to let a different admin review an unban request rather then the one who banned them initially. RE: wat #2 - cnr - 08-04-2013 Also, why was the ban request denied then an hour or so later approved? (this probably won't be denied/accepted before the length is over but if it's accepted I'd appreciate the ban off my record) RE: wat #2 - Narc - 08-04-2013 It was first denied cause I didn't see the situation, after that I was confronted by another staff member and I re-reviewed it. RE: wat #2 - Killjoy - 08-05-2013 You realize this appeal is in violation with Courthouse rules? Your only chance of getting this ban off your record is to prove the cops shot you without even attempting peaceful capture at first. RE: wat #2 - cnr - 08-05-2013 (08-05-2013, 08:44 AM)Killjoy Wrote: You realize this appeal is in violation with Courthouse rules?There's proof right up there that says they ran in breaking fearrp & shot at me. Logs will show. Also, steven was the cop I was knifing. RE: wat #2 - cnr - 08-06-2013 I'm currently on holidays so I will probably not have access to Internet or this thread. RE: wat #2 - Killjoy - 08-06-2013 Nothing in the logs to support your claims, also can't see how the officers allegedly broke FearRP. |