![]() |
Unban request [SW] Salinsky - Printable Version +- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net) +-- Forum: The Courthouse (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=13) +--- Forum: Unban Request (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=15) +---- Forum: Denied (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=32) +---- Thread: Unban request [SW] Salinsky (/showthread.php?tid=14235) |
RE: Unban request [SW] Salinsky - Flux - 05-29-2012 (05-29-2012, 09:55 PM)Kingfisher Wrote: You're really not making sense Flux. Same to you, I never said Helen played as a guy figure. And i never said that she used a gasmask eighter. I'm sorry but I get mad REALLY fast. ADMINS. Do something. RE: Unban request [SW] Salinsky - Zealord - 05-29-2012 (05-29-2012, 10:00 PM)Temar Wrote: yer i made the mistake of assuming is was helen based on seeing him pointing the tool gun I checked it out, but how do you explain all the evidence posted inside this unban request? You haven't reacted to a single one of them and it's clear that others were doing it too. Please respond to this as I would like to know what your opinion is about the clear evidence stated in this thread. Especially the ones I submitted. RE: Unban request [SW] Salinsky - Salinsky - 05-29-2012 Know what? I give up. Admins clearly can't put things in perspective. The only reasonable admins are Stillalive, Killjoy, Beflok and Ruxandra. Eitherhow, the steamchat shows a CONFESSION to the deed. The pictures show me not being ANYWHERE NEAR the car when it started freaking out. Anyway, if Helen can pretend to be a girl for like, weeks, maybe months (I don't know) And blatantly lie to just about EVERYONE on the server, doesn't that mean he can lie on here too? Doesn't that mean that there is a bigger chance of him lying in this case than me? Doesn't that mean that this guy, is obviously good at lying and misleading people? Oh well, I have said enough, Temar, it's a shame you're making such a mistake. I think the steamchat + pics of it are already a great deal of evidence, it's a confession, it won't get any better than that, really. And you banning me, cause "I WAS THE GUY IN THE SUIT" is also banning, based on an assumption. If you have no clear evidence that the guy in the suit was me, and oh boy, you don't, then why ban me for it? I may sound raged and I apologize for that, but infact, no, I am raged. And I have every right to be raged. You made a mistake and you won't come out for it. That's low. RE: Unban request [SW] Salinsky - Zealord - 05-29-2012 This is a true shame. I would've never expected things to get this out of control. Temar, I agree with Salinsky's post about how the ban is based on an assumption. You won't respond to the evidence posted in this thread. And why is toolgun abuse a 2 week ban? Since I can't see any difference from proppushing, hell, I'd even say it's safer than proppushing. I'll shut up now, because we're all not really making any friends here. I'm still curious though, and I think Salinsky should get a pardon. The abuse can't exactly be pinned on anyone, so why should he take the full blame? Where is justice? RE: Unban request [SW] Salinsky - Salinsky - 05-29-2012 I'm not here to make friends. I am here to get unbanned. RE: Unban request [SW] Salinsky - Flux - 05-29-2012 Look at Helen's unban request. What GRiiM posted, that's the evidences of you in the suit. I will shut up for now, g'night. RE: Unban request [SW] Salinsky - Temar - 05-29-2012 (05-29-2012, 09:31 PM)Kingfisher Wrote: This is the final evidence Salinsky didn't do it.First picture, you use tool gun BEFORE not during Second picture, is some time after the car first starts to fly up in air (05-29-2012, 09:38 PM)Kingfisher Wrote: Just made another one.Also later and finally [Image: NWGMq.jpg] can clearly see him (guy in suit) who just jumped down off gas bottle which i verified as salinsky by watching the video shooting tool at at under the car, and this is at the right time unlike the other picture people have been posting Thread Locked |