Approved admin abuse? - Printable Version +- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net) +-- Forum: General Discussion (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=10) +--- Forum: Off-Topic (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +---- Forum: Archive (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=41) +---- Thread: Approved admin abuse? (/showthread.php?tid=30705) |
RE: Approved admin abuse? - Killjoy - 04-26-2013 Yes, there have been valid abuse reports in the past and we have thoroughly debriefed those cases and taken appropriate disciplinary actions. RE: Approved admin abuse? - Haarek - 04-26-2013 There was one when Blackdog was admin, wich he got warned for. As far as I remember. But it wasn't really that bad, what he did. Andreas got one, I think he got warned too. Don't really know much about what happened to him though, so can't really spew out shit.. RE: Approved admin abuse? - equal - 04-26-2013 I posted one on Andreas, he told me he got demoted for a week or something. Can't really remember. RE: Approved admin abuse? - BlackDog - 04-26-2013 (04-26-2013, 08:34 AM)Midget Wrote: There was one when Blackdog was admin, wich he got warned for. As far as I remember. But it wasn't really that bad, what he did. Ahh the Ruxandra inccident, not quite an abuse thread as it was her posting an unban thread that for some reason was allowed to remain in the abuse section. The end result of the entire thing was actualy quite funny, least from the things that were told to me as to what was actualy happening RE: Approved admin abuse? - wweee2345 - 04-27-2013 (04-26-2013, 05:24 AM)Borovichok Wrote:(04-26-2013, 03:19 AM)Jarz Wrote: I believe Ruxandra's huge admin abuse thread was approved a while back. More like everyone else was too scared to post an abuse on her and when someone did with evidence, everyone posted theres. There's nothing wrong with that. I recall Shadow having an "abuse" some time ago, which resulted in his trial admin being taken away. RE: Approved admin abuse? - Toxic - 04-29-2013 Ruxandra's admin abuse thread was technically 'approved.' RE: Approved admin abuse? - BlackDog - 04-29-2013 (04-29-2013, 04:41 PM)Toxic Wrote: Ruxandra's admin abuse thread was technically 'approved.' That it was, that it was RE: Approved admin abuse? - buffalobagingi - 04-30-2013 (04-26-2013, 05:24 AM)Borovichok Wrote:(04-26-2013, 03:19 AM)Jarz Wrote: I believe Ruxandra's huge admin abuse thread was approved a while back. She was caught blackmailing people, being prejudice, and she was extremely rude to other staff members, telling them what to do and acting as if she was of higher rank. She would also deny many, many unban requests even if she wasn't involved in and wasn't the one who banned the person, which isn't aloud unless she was an SA. And no matter how much she convinced herself she was, she was not an SA. Her only excuse was "Sorry, I'm not perfect." That's why she was demoted. RE: Approved admin abuse? - BlackDog - 04-30-2013 Very well said RE: Approved admin abuse? - Mahti - 05-02-2013 Fallen *chough* |