Character
Rules
Events
Map
RP Points
Proplimits
Statistics
Steam Group
Members
Hall of Fame
Team
Bans
Blacklists
Warnings
Changelog
Content
07-24-2014, 05:53 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:03 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
I would like to put out something of a hole in Actors story, though I may be wrong of course. Actor's main argument here seems to be that we (UDA) FailRPed and team killed them (FBI) However in several posts Actor stated that Tailor wasn't president at the time of this confrontation. This information in play (hypothetically) wouldn't Actor's whole argument become invalid? Being as that if the pres died lets say, then we are no longer contracted (and seeing how it was only a short time she left presidency, and the fact all FBI where driving around) I would assume they did not have time to meet this new president to reaferm their continued partnership.(Of course I am speculating on that as I'm only going off of previous statements in the past) But regardless of that if Actor is right and we where no longer employed by government BEFORE the raid, then it was not team kill.
Also on your little thing about Using AK47s is fail RP and how you "claimed" to read through our clan page to take peaces you thought was in your favor to "askew" this in your favor you should know that the UDA is part of the UN witch is several major countries around the world, witch includes Russia, and my character even being Russian, it is more than valid to be carrying AK47s. The reason I accuse you of "skewing" information is that you have in fact pulled up lines from out own clan page to try to prove your argument. If you went that far you should have seen that we are part of the UN. Please don't use "I forgot" in your rebuttal, in my opinion someone who claims to be a Fearless Justice Member?(indicated in member tag) should know the proper facts and to be honest throughout this whole post, and in game you seem to just be coming up with what ever best reason you can find to maintain your argument. You are entitled to your own opinion, to whatever your form of justice is but please don't go around imposing it on people, if the server thinks your capable of such a thing they would make you a staff member. Before you say something like "I don't need to be a staff member to do my part to better the server."(witch is correct) Allow me to point out to you how many times I had to tell you to stop doing something because it was breaking a rule you where "unaware" of. This was only but less than a month ago as well, me have known you personally, I think you need to make sure you can go a while without breaking even the most basic rules before imposing them unto others.
Let me also point something out to you, as I'm sure you are unaware, people who work for the president may betray them with a proper RP reason, that means 3rd party government jobs like UDA, and FBI can turn on the government and not be considered "team kill" or "failRP" We had an rp reason to attack you as you were advancing down our hallway guns raised and loaded, as well as refusing to exit to the outside premisses where things could be sorted out, the outcome of that was all up to you, leave outside and sort this out with the president, our continue to advance with hostile intentions. Also the convo you had with Taylor about protecting animals, I was there and we all laughed because it was a joke, even if it was misinterpreted you do understand that the use of a mic is technically considered ooc right? This is another case you seem to be trying to skew information. I can say I'm disappointing, but not surprised in the least.
I do not agree with Actor's case, however even if he was right, he still has no case. In my opinion.
Also on your little thing about Using AK47s is fail RP and how you "claimed" to read through our clan page to take peaces you thought was in your favor to "askew" this in your favor you should know that the UDA is part of the UN witch is several major countries around the world, witch includes Russia, and my character even being Russian, it is more than valid to be carrying AK47s. The reason I accuse you of "skewing" information is that you have in fact pulled up lines from out own clan page to try to prove your argument. If you went that far you should have seen that we are part of the UN. Please don't use "I forgot" in your rebuttal, in my opinion someone who claims to be a Fearless Justice Member?(indicated in member tag) should know the proper facts and to be honest throughout this whole post, and in game you seem to just be coming up with what ever best reason you can find to maintain your argument. You are entitled to your own opinion, to whatever your form of justice is but please don't go around imposing it on people, if the server thinks your capable of such a thing they would make you a staff member. Before you say something like "I don't need to be a staff member to do my part to better the server."(witch is correct) Allow me to point out to you how many times I had to tell you to stop doing something because it was breaking a rule you where "unaware" of. This was only but less than a month ago as well, me have known you personally, I think you need to make sure you can go a while without breaking even the most basic rules before imposing them unto others.
Let me also point something out to you, as I'm sure you are unaware, people who work for the president may betray them with a proper RP reason, that means 3rd party government jobs like UDA, and FBI can turn on the government and not be considered "team kill" or "failRP" We had an rp reason to attack you as you were advancing down our hallway guns raised and loaded, as well as refusing to exit to the outside premisses where things could be sorted out, the outcome of that was all up to you, leave outside and sort this out with the president, our continue to advance with hostile intentions. Also the convo you had with Taylor about protecting animals, I was there and we all laughed because it was a joke, even if it was misinterpreted you do understand that the use of a mic is technically considered ooc right? This is another case you seem to be trying to skew information. I can say I'm disappointing, but not surprised in the least.
I do not agree with Actor's case, however even if he was right, he still has no case. In my opinion.