Posts: 4,483
Threads: 197
Likes Received: 2,776 in 1,587 posts
Likes Given: 4,963
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation:
75
Country:
04-02-2019, 02:28 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
Title of Suggestion: Rule 2.8
Description
Change or remove rule 2.8.
Why?
''2.8 Custom job titles must be realistic (don't roleplay something that isn't human), specific and accurately state what character you intend to roleplay (do not set your job as 'criminal' or 'classified' for example).''
I highlighted the part that I do not agree with. For a long time players and staff have broken this rule, but there has been few issues with it because it has enhanced roleplay. I am suggesting that the (don't roleplay something that isn't human) part should be changed to (you may roleplay as something that isn't human for a story-roleplay or event) or something similar (The part could also be straight out removed..). I have participated in roleplays where there has been non human roleplays, such as: ghosts, demons and other supernatural creatures.
Thoughts?
Posts: 3,407
Threads: 68
Likes Received: 2,150 in 1,074 posts
Likes Given: 1,191
Joined: Aug 2014
Country:
04-02-2019, 03:07 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
Personally my biggest issue with this rule lays in the following highlighted part:
''2.8 Custom job titles must be realistic (don't roleplay something that isn't human), specific and accurately state what character you intend to roleplay (do not set your job as 'criminal' or 'classified' for example).''
This specific part of the rule ends up being 'loopholed' by everyone on the server.
We see it done by staff included, aswell as myself.
"Thug" apparently perfectly allowed whilst just as vague as "criminal"
"Peepeepoopoo gang - creampie" for example, also apparently perfectly allowed within the rules.
Examples can go on.
I'd like to see this changed aswell as your specific part, that I do agree with.
+Support
Posts: 3,532
Threads: 312
Likes Received: 1,607 in 839 posts
Likes Given: 1,723
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
76
Country:
04-02-2019, 06:06 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
+support
Though it should include a line that forbids players from roleplaying as animals when it makes no sense, such as someone roleplaying as a dog while they are quite clearly a human.
But for various RP situations, things like a "Cyborg/Robot" would be nice. Same with like any sort of infected creature etc.
Posts: 1,430
Threads: 153
Likes Received: 478 in 293 posts
Likes Given: 1,248
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
43
04-02-2019, 06:21 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(04-02-2019, 03:07 PM)Agorith Wrote: Personally my biggest issue with this rule lays in the following highlighted part:
''2.8 Custom job titles must be realistic (don't roleplay something that isn't human), specific and accurately state what character you intend to roleplay (do not set your job as 'criminal' or 'classified' for example).''
This specific part of the rule ends up being 'loopholed' by everyone on the server.
We see it done by staff included, aswell as myself.
"Thug" apparently perfectly allowed whilst just as vague as "criminal"
"Peepeepoopoo gang - creampie" for example, also apparently perfectly allowed within the rules.
Examples can go on.
I'd like to see this changed aswell as your specific part, that I do agree with.
+Support
This ^
FearlessRPÂ
____________________________________________________________________________________
If you can read this you're a coon
Posts: 4,483
Threads: 197
Likes Received: 2,776 in 1,587 posts
Likes Given: 4,963
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation:
75
Country:
04-02-2019, 07:05 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
(04-02-2019, 06:06 PM)TheSiphon Wrote: +support
Though it should include a line that forbids players from roleplaying as animals when it makes no sense, such as someone roleplaying as a dog while they are quite clearly a human.
But for various RP situations, things like a "Cyborg/Robot" would be nice. Same with like any sort of infected creature etc.
Yes I agree. Animals should not be allowed to be roleplayed.
Posts: 680
Threads: 40
Likes Received: 228 in 176 posts
Likes Given: 975
Joined: Mar 2018
Reputation:
20
Country:
04-02-2019, 08:41 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
+Support
Regards,
Fearless Donator
Posts: 715
Threads: 23
Likes Received: 442 in 306 posts
Likes Given: 871
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation:
15
Country:
04-02-2019, 09:16 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(04-02-2019, 03:07 PM)Agorith Wrote: Personally my biggest issue with this rule lays in the following highlighted part:
''2.8 Custom job titles must be realistic (don't roleplay something that isn't human), specific and accurately state what character you intend to roleplay (do not set your job as 'criminal' or 'classified' for example).''
This specific part of the rule ends up being 'loopholed' by everyone on the server.
We see it done by staff included, aswell as myself.
"Thug" apparently perfectly allowed whilst just as vague as "criminal"
"Peepeepoopoo gang - creampie" for example, also apparently perfectly allowed within the rules.
Examples can go on.
I'd like to see this changed aswell as your specific part, that I do agree with.
+Support
^ Mhm
Posts: 1,468
Threads: 102
Likes Received: 578 in 398 posts
Likes Given: 673
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
39
Country:
04-02-2019, 11:24 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
+support
I have seen some great RP's where people have roleplayed a robot or similar.
Posts: 262
Threads: 28
Likes Received: 55 in 50 posts
Likes Given: 202
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
6
Country:
04-03-2019, 06:30 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(04-02-2019, 03:07 PM)Agorith Wrote: Personally my biggest issue with this rule lays in the following highlighted part:
''2.8 Custom job titles must be realistic (don't roleplay something that isn't human), specific and accurately state what character you intend to roleplay (do not set your job as 'criminal' or 'classified' for example).''
This specific part of the rule ends up being 'loopholed' by everyone on the server.
We see it done by staff included, aswell as myself.
"Thug" apparently perfectly allowed whilst just as vague as "criminal"
"Peepeepoopoo gang - creampie" for example, also apparently perfectly allowed within the rules.
Examples can go on.
I'd like to see this changed aswell as your specific part, that I do agree with.
+Support
Posts: 5,176
Threads: 150
Likes Received: 3,645 in 1,769 posts
Likes Given: 2,715
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation:
105
Country:
04-03-2019, 08:38 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(04-02-2019, 03:07 PM)Agorith Wrote: Personally my biggest issue with this rule lays in the following highlighted part:
''2.8 Custom job titles must be realistic (don't roleplay something that isn't human), specific and accurately state what character you intend to roleplay (do not set your job as 'criminal' or 'classified' for example).''
This specific part of the rule ends up being 'loopholed' by everyone on the server.
We see it done by staff included, aswell as myself.
"Thug" apparently perfectly allowed whilst just as vague as "criminal"
"Peepeepoopoo gang - creampie" for example, also apparently perfectly allowed within the rules.
Examples can go on.
I'd like to see this changed aswell as your specific part, that I do agree with.
+Support
This actually made me laugh cause it's so true. Good points above, and from you Random. I agree!
|