Character
Rules
Events
Map
RP Points
Proplimits
Statistics
Steam Group
Members
Hall of Fame
Team
Bans
Blacklists
Warnings
Changelog
Content
08-04-2016, 12:43 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:05 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
I don't get why all moderators and admins (with no involvement whatsoever) get a pass to voice their opinion on every abuse thread when normal members are not given the same treatment. They rarely add much besides arguing (i.e. discussing - what the idea is to avoid) for the admin in question, something that should be reserved for those making the final judgement.
I understand the rationale behind closing them from becoming a discussion, but allowing admins - involved or not - to comment doesn't follow that very rationale.
The way I see it posting should be limited to only people directly involved (administrators or not) and SAs. In addition sometimes posts are still left up only with a warning while som others are entirely removed. This should be streamlined with all posts entirely removed and replaced with a warning.
Despite this I want to make it clear that I'm happy for the fact efforts are being taken to keep admin abuse threads public and accessable for everybody. That's best for everybody.
I understand the rationale behind closing them from becoming a discussion, but allowing admins - involved or not - to comment doesn't follow that very rationale.
The way I see it posting should be limited to only people directly involved (administrators or not) and SAs. In addition sometimes posts are still left up only with a warning while som others are entirely removed. This should be streamlined with all posts entirely removed and replaced with a warning.
Despite this I want to make it clear that I'm happy for the fact efforts are being taken to keep admin abuse threads public and accessable for everybody. That's best for everybody.