General Rickets
#8
I find nothing wrong here. Your previous, already processed case was posted as an example of precedent. You were involved in the old case, but it was only posted as precedent. It was not posted to try and find a new resolution to that previous case, and you had no involvement in the current case - It was not about you. In a real court of law, when they bring up precedent, they don't get the old people involved. You interpreted this wrong and received a standard forum warning - no big deal.


Messages In This Thread
General Rickets - by Ivan Tempski - 03-01-2015, 01:02 PM
RE: General Rickets - by General Rickets - 03-01-2015, 01:07 PM
RE: General Rickets - by Ivan Tempski - 03-01-2015, 01:12 PM
RE: General Rickets - by Nevy - 03-01-2015, 01:21 PM
RE: General Rickets - by Ivan Tempski - 03-01-2015, 01:49 PM
RE: General Rickets - by General Rickets - 03-01-2015, 01:51 PM
RE: General Rickets - by Jan - 03-01-2015, 01:53 PM
RE: General Rickets - by Faustie - 03-01-2015, 02:03 PM
RE: General Rickets - by Ivan Tempski - 03-01-2015, 02:10 PM
RE: General Rickets - by Nyander - 03-01-2015, 04:42 PM
RE: General Rickets - by Ivan Tempski - 03-01-2015, 04:55 PM
RE: General Rickets - by Nacreas - 03-01-2015, 05:29 PM
RE: General Rickets - by Preditor - 03-01-2015, 05:36 PM
RE: General Rickets - by Fultz - 03-01-2015, 05:44 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)